Möjliggör ränteläget och amorteringsfrihet mutor i Sverige?

Själv tycker jag höger-vänster är ganska meningslöst, idag går skiljelinjen snarare mellan globalister-antiglobalister och då är Front national antiglobalister. Saken är den att FN knappast är extemister på något sätt. Etablissemanget vill gärna stämpla alla tendenser till nationalism som extremistisk vilket det inte är. Vilka är tex mest extrema av MP och SD? Det är meningslöst och fördummande att tala om partier i termer av extremt eftersom det är helt subjektivt.

Det är väl så uppenbart att det inte behöver sägas? Men ok… Front National söker samförstånd med Ryssland och är positivt inställda till Putins vision om en multipolär världsordning.

Att Jean marie Le Pen är Nazikollaboratör tror jag inte en sekund på. Det är lika falskt som att han förnekat förintelsen och sagt att Ebola ska lösa invandringsproblematiken.

Now, if savings leave the matrix “system”, we will see in the long run an important de-leveraging, as the credit multiplier
becomes less and less powerful. With more assets outside the system, the pricing mechanism becomes less efficient, since there
are fewer signals to market participants. Capital markets disappear, specialization decreases, economies of scale are threatened.
With more assets outside the system, productivity plunges and with it, unemployment skyrockets in rigid (unionized) labour
markets (characteristic of developed economies). As developed economies, with high stock of capital, rely on economies of
scale, this fundamental transformation has enormous damaging potential.
The flight from the system brings more financial repression as a logic reaction. In those nations with established coercive
savings plans pension plans, politicians set their eyes on these virgin pools of capital, to force a bid to their liabilities (i.e.
sovereign debt). This process eventually spirals, since the financial repression aimed to prevent market participants from
protecting their inter-temporal exchange decisions, grows exponentially and brings about precisely the opposite outcome: A
complete defence of savings, now fully thrown into an informal economy.
At this point, something has to be said about wealth transfer, because not every market participant is able to re-allocate his/her
investments and re-direct his/her savings from the system to the informal world. Those who cannot save enough, those
employed in firms and trapped in pension plans, will see their assets evaporate. If the harm is too significant, it may even be a
cause for them to leave their condition as employees and become self-employed. This is the landmark of underdeveloped
economies: A huge mass of self-employed, undercapitalized citizens in an informal system. The informality prevents them from
accessing credit, which enhances their undercapitalization.
Finally, we ask that you note one last thing: As productivity, employment and production decrease, even a steady and low rate
of inflation has the potential to morph into hyperinflation. It’s only a matter of time, and it occurs once the capital markets
(including the futures markets) vanish, when the only reason to demand currency is for transactional purposes, when the
demand of currency to settle debts is only marginal.